UPDATE: 02/21/08    Did you see the new Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

 Welcome to the battle against the real act of terrorism in America!

 Join nationwide classactions against the illegal acts of family courts and CPS!

 Click here for more details on how all types of victimized NCP and CPS parents, any now-adult children, and any taxpayer (even businesses) can all join these lawsuits.
 Looking for your particular county? Click the "Class-Actions!" link on the left.

 In a custody battle? Don't be deceived - you already had custody!

 The most important thing that people need to understand is that every parent has already had full physical and legal custody of their children from the very moment of their births. This is the simple truth under the real law... Instead, most people still, to this very day, mistakenly believe that when a divorce or paternity action starts, that it will all be about the typical "he said - she said" arguments, supposedly in order to see which parent gets "awarded" custody of the children... This is the commonly wrong misconception of what is really happening in today's family courts...

 Likewise, the standard practices of child protective "services" are also extremely violative in nature, very rarely comply with the parents' Constitutional and Due Process rights to retain custody of their kids, absent the pre-requisite clear and convincing finding of very serious unfitness. There must be this, and an attorney, or it's all void.

 The real truth, under the real law, and as consistently ruled by the United States Supreme Court for nearly an entire century now, is that no state agency, entity, or official - which includes a state family court judge - may ever take away any parent's custody of their children, without having first found, and only by "clear and convincing evidence", that the parent is seriously unfit to parent the children in question - i.e., what has been happening in state family courts and CPS agencies is strictly unconstitutional: the taking away of any parents' pre-existing child custody, without first proving serious parental unfitness by clear and convincing evidence.

 In other words, if a state family court judge has taken away your pre-existing custody, in either a divorce, paternity, or CPS action, without first finding, by serious evidence, of serious danger of child abuse or neglect, then that order - no matter if it is a "temporary" or "permanent" custody order - is unconstitutional, and is already legally null and void. Such unlawful orders violate a parent's various individual constitutional rights to due process, under the 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th, 10th and 14th Amendments, and, for divorce and paternity custody disputes between the parents, is also violative as gender discrimination, for upholding the right of one parent to retain their pre-existing custody, while taking away the custody of the other parent without lawful basis.

 Again, please see the Frequently Asked Questions page for more information.

 A brief background on the earlier classaction lawsuits against the states.

 After launching the first wave of nationwide classaction lawsuits against the states themselves, beginning in September of 2004, most of the different federal judges chose, sooner or later, to knowingly commit treason against their oaths of office, by willfully ignoring the clear law provided to them of 42 USC 2000d-7 that expressly waives a state's immunity when the state's federally funded programs and activities discriminate, like we still, to this day, constantly experience within state family courts, which are, in fact, partially subsidized by federal dollars. Actually, there are a handful of these previous classaction lawsuits still pending in the lower federal district courts, and there have been, as of this writing, at least four of the wrongfully dismissed classaction lawsuits against the states brought up on appeal in the higher federal courts.

 Why now sue the counties instead of suing the states?

 Suing a county or city for relief and other damages ($$) is well established in this country, and can easily be done. In fact, it is done all the time - even almost every day, somewhere in this country. Moreover, cities and towns and counties do not have any immunity to being sued, which blows away the very notion of dismissing a federal lawsuit for immunity...

 You can take a look at this spreadsheet to see comparisons between the older state-based lawsuits, versus these new county/city-based classactions.

 So, how do I take part in a classaction against my county or city?

 The particular classaction that you are interested in may have enough people already to get started... Check our "Class-Actions!" page to find out... otherwise:

 To file a classaction lawsuit against the county or city that has your interest, there needs to be a minimum of forty (40) parents, now-young-adult children, and taxpayer plaintiffs in the same county/city Yahoo Group. A major, nationwide electronic blitz will soon send the public streaming here to find their own County or City groups, so there will be more than enough people at the time of national filings. However, there are also various other ways in which to locate and contact other plaintiffs just like you. All of the various federal lawsuit paperwork will be provided to the "county team leader" and his/her local group of people, who will just swap names, sign their paperwork, and split the filing fees. Please read the FAQ for more details on all the above.

 While the federal lawsuit against your county is designed for a minimum of forty people to originally file, there are also three simple papers for any and all other noncustodials, CPS victims, adult children and taxpayers to join in the lawsuit at any time after it is first filed. However, filing with the original group gives better "legal standing"... So, the more at kickoff, the merrier. For details, please see our "Class-Actions!" page...

 It's no joke: In God We Trust. United We Stand. Together, We Shall Overcome!